Skip to content
Defense360
A Project of the Center for Strategic and International Studies
Global Go to Think Tank Index ranking #1 U.S. Think Tank and Center of Excellence for Defense and National Security
  • Analysis
  • Data
  • Opinion
  • About
  • Series: Bad Ideas in National Security
  • Acquisition
  • Budget
  • Forces
  • Reform
  • Strategy

Tag: Integrated Deterrence

  • Filter Results:

Opinion / Strategy

Bad Idea: Integrated Deterrence as Strategy

The 2022 NDS aims to “strengthen U.S. deterrence” to defend the status quo against America’s adversaries. But this strategy neglects the limits of deterrence. Instead, U.S. defense strategy should embrace an expanded concept of integrated influence with a broader focus on coercion and persuasion.

February 27, 2023 — Sean Monaghan
Opinion / Forces, Strategy

Bad Idea: Relying on “Integrated Deterrence” Instead of Building Sufficient U.S. Military Power

As the Biden administration implements “integrated deterrence,” Thomas Spoehr warns the application of non-military tools, such as economic sanctions and diplomatic condemnation, should not replace or diminish the need to build sufficient military power.

December 3, 2021 — Thomas Spoehr
Center for Strategic and International Studies

The CSIS International Security Program (ISP) is a constant source of reliable analysis on the threats and opportunities shaping U.S. security interests at home and abroad.

Connect with Us

1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036
intlsecurity@csis.org
@CSISDefense360
© 2023 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy